Relationships Operating Model: How to ensure Alignment of Physical Assets between different types of Data Assets

We have just finished rapid start and have built an operating model for processes which looks like this:

Business Process >  Business Terms  > Physical Assets

However we amended this operating model to include Machine Learning Models which operates like this:

Machine Learning Model > Features > Physical Assets

We then combined these two flows to look like the diagram:

Please note only certain processes in the business make use of Machine Learning Models

However because features and Business Terms are independently linked to Physical Assets there is the potential that the two won't align.  i.e. if a feature is changed and the business terms are not updated if you look at Physical Assets used in the Machine Learning model this won't give the same list of Physical Assets linked via the Business Process.  We don't want Features linked to Physical Assets via Business Terms.

Is there a way to amend this model or use particular relationship types to avoid the misalignment described in paragraph above.

Other mitigations we are considering are using reporting to monitor and potentially workflows to enforce changes are done together.