Collibra Community

Operating model

Created Sep 3, 2024

4 members

3 discussions

The Operating Model topic in the Collibra Community is designed for users defining or customizing how data assets, roles, and responsibilities are structured within Collibra. It includes discussions around scope assignments, asset type configurations, and aligning business processes with metadata—ideal for teams building scalable, governance-driven frameworks.

user_55d43f
5 months ago
How to Customize Asset Type Attributes when in a Specific Domain
Hello, I am new to Collibra and I want to customize aasset type attributes when in a specific domain. My use case is there is the report asset and when a report is created in a specific domain, I want the report asset layout to have specific attributes that are just for a report in that domain. I don't want to add them to the global assignment. Any direction would be extremely helpful!

3
christineventolaa4a79c
5 months ago
Retrieve scope assignments via API (or any method)?
Does anyone know of a way that I can get a list of all the assignments in a particular scope? Given a scope ID: return a list of all assignments (relations and attributes) for each of the Asset Types that the Scope is assigned to. I don't see anything in the REST API documentation that would produce this, and short of manually copying everything down myself, I don't see another alternative. Has anyone encountered and/or solved for this? I am in a situation where I need to consolidate 2 scopes, but I don't want to accidentally overlook an attribute or relation that was in one but not the other. Thanks! Note: according to the documentation, OMRE does not seem to cover this use case, but even if it does, I am not able to implement it in my org, so I am looking for another option.

0
timredward
6 months ago
Relationships Operating Model: How to ensure Alignment of Physical Assets between different types of Data Assets
We have just finished rapid start and have built an operating model for processes which looks like this: Business Process > Business Terms > Physical Assets However we amended this operating model to include Machine Learning Models which operates like this: Machine Learning Model > Features > Physical Assets We then combined these two flows to look like the diagram: Please note only certain processes in the business make use of Machine Learning Models However because features and Business Terms are independently linked to Physical Assets there is the potential that the two won't align. i.e. if a feature is changed and the business terms are not updated if you look at Physical Assets used in the Machine Learning model this won't give the same list of Physical Assets linked via the Business Process. We don't want Features linked to Physical Assets via Business Terms. Is there a way to amend this model or use particular relationship types to avoid the misalignment described in paragraph above. Other mitigations we are considering are using reporting to monitor and potentially workflows to enforce changes are done together.

3

How to Customize Asset Type Attributes when in a Specific Domain

Retrieve scope assignments via API (or any method)?

Relationships Operating Model: How to ensure Alignment of Physical Assets between different types of Data Assets

How to Customize Asset Type Attributes when in a Specific Domain

Retrieve scope assignments via API (or any method)?

Relationships Operating Model: How to ensure Alignment of Physical Assets between different types of Data Assets