My organization is considering including both business-centric stewardship and collibra-centric stewardship within the responsibilities section of our assets. We recognize this would require going beyond the OOTB roles that exist to create our own roles. Here's a draft breakdown of how the two different approaches to responsibilities could be broken down: Business-Centric Ownership and Stewardship: Focuses on what the data represents, how it’s used, and its value to the organization. Roles: Data Owner: Accountable for data quality, policies, and usage. Data Steward: Maintains data quality and ensures proper use. Business Subject Matter Expert: Provides business context and definitions. Data Consumer: Uses the data for analysis or decision-making. Collibra-Centric (Platform) Ownership and Stewardship: Focuses on how data governance is executed within Collibra—maintaining workflows, maintaining metadata models, and managing the platform. Roles: Collibra Administrator: Manages users, permissions, configurations. Workflow Designer: Builds and maintains approval or review workflows. Collibra Steward (technical): Ensures metadata is entered and maintained properly. System Integrator: Manages integrations with data sources Does anyone have experience with this kind of responsibility model with two types of stewardship? I'd love to have to open forum to discuss the pros and cons of this approach.
