Collibra Community

Hi! Has anyone ever tried to put a hyperlink in a error message of a validation rule and has it worked? We have tried with the standard html tag <a href="LINK"> TEXT </a> and unfortunately it did not work.

I’d like to share an example of the generic (universal) metadata model. It covers policy, standards, data sets, APIs, DQ, reports, sharing, privacy, and more. And I hope it will help in your data governance journey. I would also like to ask your help in turning this into a living best practice. How to contribute Suggest what asset types or relations are missing There is no goal to connect everything with everything, so suggest only critical relations Share real examples from your org. that would help to inspire other Data Citizens And of course, don't hesitate to share your opinion about others’ ideas. We are all learning here. Links Miro board with the WHOLE DIAGRAM and free access to everyone: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVJT7Rdzw=/ Password: Collibra2025 Jump in. Build with us. 🙌

Hello, What happened to the Import button? I only have the export option, but it still allows me to download the data needed to re-import? See screenshot, the export icon is there, the import is not. Note: This is not an issue in my dev environment, only prod.

hi - is it good practise to create new domain types to control where assets can be created, or should the 'out of the box' domain types be the utilised in favour of any new domain types? thanks

hi, has anyone used the guided stewardship approach to catalogue blended data? At the physical layer I have a claims table with a claim id. The claim id originates from 2 different sources. I have 1 data model asset and 2 entity assets (one for each data source). Can i have 2 data attributes, one for each entity? thanks

Anyone having issues with Power BI lineage not working consistantly? We have had 2 years of problems, that we are stuggling with getting lineage to work with Power BI. Would love to hear others experience with it. Below is latest issue and workaround. Issue Summary The lineage issue is caused by a mismatch between the Power Query Analyzer’s static analysis and the script’s dynamic column renaming approach. The Analyzer requires all information to be static, but the script dynamically generates its renaming map at runtime. This results in an incomplete lineage map with mismatched source and target column names. Workaround The recommended approach is to refactor the dynamic rename operation into a static, explicit mapping. This aligns the script with the Analyzer’s expectations and ensures accurate lineage. Current Dynamic Implementation (causes mismatch): #"Renamed Dynamically" = Table.RenameColumns(Source,     List.Transform(Table.ColumnNames(Source), each Text.Proper(Text.Replace(_, "_", " "))) ) Proposed Static Implementation (aligns with Analyzer): #"Renamed Manually" = Table.RenameColumns(Source, {     {"PROCEDURE_CODE", "Procedure Code"},     {"PROCEDURE_DESCRIPTION", "Procedure Description"},     {"CDT_PROCEDURE_CATEGORY", "Cdt Procedure Category"}     // ...etc., for all required columns }) By using this static approach, the column renaming will remain consistent and correctly interpreted by the Analyzer.

Hi, we do not have the data quality and observability feature, but we do have data quality metrics catalogued in the Data Quality Metric asset type. This asset type is related to Data Quality Rule which is related to Column. I created an custom aggregation path from column to metrics to display the data quality metrics against a given column, but no results are returned in the Column asset. Instead I get the message " No data quality monitors yet." Any ideas why this might be happening? All suggestions gratefully received.

Or has anyone written a validation that uses the values stored in an attribute to determine allowable values? I need to values names and descriptions to ensure they contain the name of a color, which will be stored in the attribute. Rather than store the allowable values in the validation itself, I want to store the values in an attribute, so my developers dont have to constantly change the validation to accommodate user requests. Thanks for helping with this question or the previous version where the values were stored in a code list