Collibra Community logo
    • Community Resources
      • Discussions
      • Adoption Corner
      • FAQ
      • Take a tour
      • Request a demo
      • Community job board
      • Resources
    • Participate
      • Discussions
      • Ideation
    • Learn
      • Customer stories
      • Marketplace
      • Blogs
      • University
      • Knowledge Base
      • Developer Portal
      • Podcast “Data Citizens Dialogues”
      • Collibra Excellence Awards
    • Support
      • Support Portal
      • Documentation
      • Release notes
      • Product resource center
    • User Groups and Events
      • Events
      • Collibra Customer Events
      • Data Citizens® User Groups
    All PostsDiscussionsCommunity ArticlesDiscussions
    Leaderboards
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
    •                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
    Discussions
    Collibra Logo Community
    • About Collibra
    • Collibra Platform
    • Blog
    • Careers
    • Partner Program
    • Contact us
    © 2026 Collibra. All rights reserved.
    • Privacy and legal
    • Do not sell or share my personal information
    © 2026 Collibra. All rights reserved.
    • TagsChevronRightIcon
    System Optimization
    • Discussion
      Enzo Galhardo
      • ProductChevronRightIcon
      • Data Governance
               
      Enzo Galhardo
      Best practices for Data Quality Rule IDs: Proposed Taxonomy design & Automating generation at scale
                                                       

      Hi Collibra Community, We are currently re-architecting our naming conventions and structural standards for Data Quality Rule assets in Collibra, integrated with an external Data Quality execution engine (Ataccama ONE). Our Current Setup & The Legacy State Technical Integration: We leverage Collibra's native 128-bit UUID as the immutable physical key, mapped directly to the DQ engine's externalId via REST APIs for metric write-backs. Current Legacy IDs: Today, our logical rule IDs rely on a simple legacy pattern like V01 , V02 , etc. Assigned manually, this approach lacks business context, carries a high risk of duplicate sequences, and clearly does not scale as rule volume grows into the hundreds or thousands. The Proposed Idea & Problem Statement We want to replace V01 with a structured, human-readable taxonomy. We are considering the following pattern: $$\text{[DOMAIN]\_[SYSTEM]\_[TABLE/ENTITY]\_[DQ\_DIMENSION]\_[SEQUENCE]}$$ (Example: FIN_SAP_CUST_CMP_001 ) However, our leadership correctly pointed out that we should not reinvent the wheel . We want to validate both the design of this taxonomy and the method of generating it to ensure long-term scalability without human friction. Questions for the Community Taxonomy Best Practice: Is [DOMAIN]_[SYSTEM]_[TABLE/ENTITY]_[DQ_DIMENSION]_[SEQUENCE] aligned with industry standards for Collibra, or does it become too rigid in practice? What naming pattern has worked best in your mature deployments? Automated Generation: How do you automate business ID generation to eliminate manual typing by Data Stewards? Do you enforce this exclusively via Collibra BPMN Workflows (Activiti / Groovy scripts) during the rule intake form? Sequence Counters: What is the recommended approach to maintain dynamic, auto-incrementing sequence counters (e.g., finding the next available _001 , _002 per domain/system) within Collibra? Out-of-the-Box / Marketplace Solutions: Are there OOTB Collibra features, Workflow building blocks, or Marketplace accelerators specifically designed for auto-incrementing asset codes? Reliable Resources & Reference Materials: If possible, could you share links to official Collibra documentation, whitepapers, community articles, or reliable study resources that cover DQ rule asset modeling and automated ID generation best practices? We would love to hear your insights on both the naming design, automation mechanics, and any reference documentation you can recommend so we can build a 100% hands-off, scalable solution! Thanks in advance for sharing your experience!

      2 days ago
      0
               
    • Discussion
      Fatima Rodriguez
      • ProductChevronRightIcon
      • Data LineageChevronRightIcon
      • BI Integrations
               
      Fatima Rodriguez
      Can Collibra Ingest Tableau Prep Flow Assets?
                                       

      Hi everyone, My organization set up a connection to our Tableau Server and we are currently ingesting a majority of Tableau assets including workbooks and dashboards. However, the only thing we are not seeing are the Tableau Prep Flows available on our Tableau Server. Reading through the Collibra Documentation around Setting Up Tableau, I do not find any information how this asset type can be ingested. Are Tableau Prep Flows just not supported or am I missing a step in our connection setup? This is the only document where I can see what tableau assets can be ingested, but no mention of prep flows. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Fatima

      5 months agolast reply 4 months ago
      3
               
    • Question
      • WorkflowsChevronRightIcon
      Long-Running Workflows?

      Hey there, How bad would it be performance-wise (or otherwise) to have ~150-200 multi-day workflows running at one time? For context, I'm considering whether we should build complex, multi-day approval workflows in Collibra vs. another tool. Coming from an Appian background, my approach has always been to store request state (created, approved, returned for revision, etc.) in a record/database entity, and use "workflows" only to move the request between states (kicking a new workflow off when someone takes action, and completing it when the action is finished & new request state is written to the database). Is this a common practice with Collibra workflows as well? If not, have you seen/heard about any performance issues that may come from hundreds of workflows sitting in memory for days at a time? Thank you!

      Grant Gadomski
      Grant Gadomski
      Posted 1 year ago • Last reply 1 year ago
      1
               
    • Question
      • WorkflowChevronRightIcon
      Long-Running Workflows Performance

      Hey there, How bad would it be performance-wise (or otherwise) to have ~150-200 multi-day workflows running at one time? For context, I'm considering whether we should build complex, multi-day approval workflows in Collibra vs. another tool. Coming from an Appian background, my approach has always been to store request state (created, approved, returned for revision, etc.) in a record/database entity, and use "workflows" only to move the request between states (kicking a new workflow off when someone takes action, and completing it when the action is finished & new request state is written to the database). Is this a common practice with Collibra workflows as well? If not, have you seen/heard about any performance issues that may come from hundreds of workflows sitting in memory for days at a time? Thank you!

      Grant Gadomski
      Grant Gadomski
      Posted 1 year ago • Last reply 1 year ago
      3
               
    • Question
      • Data Quality & ObservabilityChevronRightIcon
      Postgres metastore tables where the metabar details of Collibra DQ dataset findings page are stored

      Hello there, Can anyone help me understand from which Postgres metastore tables the metabar details of Collibra DQ dataset findings page are fetched - Screenshot attached. To be more specific, would like to know where the below are stored : 1.column count 2.Source details 3.Data Category Thanks, Hazeena

      hyoosaf
      hyoosaf
      Posted 1 year ago • Last reply 1 year ago
      4
               
    • Question
      • Product Q&AChevronRightIcon
      Calculation of the Seats for the new Licensing Model

      Hello, we have not yet transitioned to the new licensing model and there are some situations not clear. If someone who had the experience, can shed some light, it would be much appreciated. All is clear on the way a license is determined for individual user, based on the role or membership in a certain group - higher license always prevails. There is also the buffer of 20% to manage consumption and 9 weeks in which the consumption is monitored and then some restrictions are implemented. What is not clear is the counting of the licenses. Example: User A occupies Viewer license and is at some point assigned a role that requires Contributor license based on some permission. At that point user A is +1 for Contributor license count. What happens if the user A no longer has that role that requires Contributor license? Is he still counted in the Contributor license count even though he now occupies the Viewer license? Is there a time period in which you are counted in the higher license count or does it change the second you lose the role/are not in the group anymore? Documentation does not specify anything related to this and it is hard to explain to the clients and cover all the possible situations. And there are a lot of them, imagination goes wild, ex. someone puts wrong user in a group and he now occupies higher license forever even though never used permissions that counts for a higher license? Update: found a part on the Allowance limits if the consumption is calculated weekly that means that user A is counted for Contributor license only in weeks that he occupied a role/group that requires some permission from Contributor - is that correct and tested in the real world? Thanks in advance, Ivan

      Ivan Tokić
      Ivan Tokić
      Posted 1 year ago • Last reply 1 year ago
      1